Barefoot Monologues

A Journey of the Sole


Review: Luna Sandals Mono with Ribbon Laces


Having been part of this whole “barefoot” and “minimalist” running world for a few years now, and having seen it change and grow, I have come to know a lot about the innovators and entrepreneurs who have brought so much to it for so many people. One of those innovators is the Luna Sandals company. Powered by some of the most fun-loving, kind and down to earth people you could ever meet [at the Born to Run Ultra], Luna Sandals is as much a culture as it is a company. How great would it be to work for such a place!

It’s sadly just so rare these days to find a company that is just as good at professionalism and quality as it is at having fun and being passionate about the same things their customers are. Luna has this and I find it totally refreshing. This is one of the biggest reasons why I love to support and promote them and their products.


The other reason is that I really love their sandals, guys! Last year I got the opportunity to review their original suede-covered sandal (renamed “Venado”) with the ATS laces that had just come out. Once I wore those babies in they became my only piece of footwear during the summer. I wore them for the 3,000 miles from Boston to San Diego when we made our big move. I ran, hiked, climbed and lived in them so much that the foot bed now has a fine patina and they have a fit so perfect that it would charm the likes of Cinderella.

oldshoeLast year’s Venado – beautifully worn in.

The only place I didn’t love my Luna Venados was when I ran up steep hills, which is a frequent occurrence for me around here. The tread on the soles was pretty flat and didn’t hold on to the ground as well as I liked, especially after building in some wear. So when I saw the new Mono food bed (pronounced “moe-no”, and is Spanish for “monkey”), I thought it might be a good alternative for the trails. Much thanks to the generous Lunar Monkeys, I was able to snag a pair cut down to the shape of my foot, and this time I decided to try some tie laces rather than the ATS.

The Mono Foot Bed

Instead of suede like in my Venado footbed, the sole of my Mono is covered in Pittard’s leather. This is supposed to be a more premium material than the suede, and less slippery in wet conditions. I found the leather to be comfortable and yes, seemed to have a better traction to my foot when wet. But the leather doesn’t get that nice form-fitting wear-in that makes my Venados feel so special. At least not yet, anyway. That could be due in part to the thickness of the sole (12mm as opposed to the Venado, which I think is 6mm), which turns out has its own list of considerations.


Because the sole’s rubber is so thick, the toe and ankle holes are able to be counter-sunk, which means they dug into the sole a bit so that the laces don’t rub against the ground. This is a definite plus for the life of your laces. The sole of the Mono has some tread, so the traction is much better than the Venado for trail, although not as rugged as the Leadville (their recommended trail sandal). The Mono is more of an all-terrain sandal, which works for someone like me who is just as likely to wear them to the farmer’s market as I am to bring them on trail.

bottomThese photos shoe the sunken-in laces and toe plug.

And speaking of trails: I actually found myself running some trails in this shoe, especially when paired with the right laces (more on that later). The extra oomph of the footbed gives me just a little more traction – not enough to run down Torrey Pines Gliderport, most likely, but it works. The only negative I experienced is the thickness of the foot bed. It’s 12mm. That’s thick enough to keep me from feeling the ground. Most people don’t have the ankle problem that I do, but if I can’t feel the subtle ground changes below me, I lose proprioception, and thus I lose the reaction time I need to prevent twisted ankles.

So unfortunately I’m not really sure how much trail running I’ll do in these sandals, and I may consider purchasing a pair of Leadville Pacers for their rugged traction and thinner sole, and then have the full array of Luna sandals to meet my running needs.

The Laces

Your choice of lacing is probably the most personal, make-it-or-break-it aspect of any Luna Sandal. There’s the no-fuss ATS lacing, the ¼”  or 10mm leather laces, traditional hemp laces, and new to the game, the ribbon laces (currently offered in black and blue). I requested the tying laces as opposed to the more popular ATS laces this time around because I really love the way they look all wrapped around my foot and ankle – I find it pretty and stylish. I got my Monos before the ribbon laces were available. So when my pair came in they had a set of 10mm laces, the thicker leather that they offer. I don’t actually know why I chose the 10mm (or even if I did), but I wasn’t a fan. They were so thick and unflexible that I couldn’t get them to stay tied. They literally fell off my feet while I walked. Perhaps the ¼” laces would have made me happier. However, once I saw a few photos of sandals with the new ribbon lacing, I had to snag a set for myself (and at $12, they weren’t too much of a risk).

oldlacesMy feet up on the dashboard in the 10mm leather laces.

And my gosh what a world of difference! The ribbon laces may or may not be as long-lasting as the leather ones (this remains to be seen) but I very much prefer the plush, pliable fabric of the ribbon (which is sort of like a much softer version of a backpack or seatbelt strap).

Used to be I always stuck with the pre-tied huarache because traditional tied laces tend to slide right off my heels. Doesn’t matter how tight or loose I tie the things, the heel strap just doesn’t stay put. But because the ribbon lacing is so workable, I was able to find my own tying method (see below) that keeps the shoe in place permanently. For the first time, my feet are comfortable, there is no rubbing, and I don’t have to adjust or retie…ever. This tying method has worked so well for me that I even prefer it over the ATS lacing, and the new ribbon is so perfect that it makes any Luna sandal the most comfortable huarache you’ll ever put on your feet. Yeah, I said it. For the first time ever I can actually see myself comfortably running a distance race in a pair of sandals.

That’s big.

backThe tying method for those with flat heels: loop the lace once under the heel strap, and it doesn’t budge.

The Wrap-Up

Overall, I dig the Mono and I know I will wear it a lot. I miss the suede footbed, but I think I’ll get used to the Pittard’s leather and eventually see the up-sides of it. I probably won’t be spending a lot of time running trail in the Mono because of its thick sole, but I can see myself tying them on for a road run on a hot day or for some hiking with my dog. I will probably wear them everywhere I go this summer, however. I love the way they look and feel with the ribbon lacing, especially now that I have the tying part down. They are exceedingly comfortable, secure and even fashionable. If you’re looking for the all-terrain, super comfortable huarache shoe that has a little more sole protection, this is your Luna. If you don’t have a problem with thicker soles on easy trails (or prefer it), you’ll love wearing the Mono on the trail as much as on the road. But if you’re hoping for a sandal with amazing traction and don’t care about the leather footbed, go for the Leadville (12mm thick sole) or Leadville Pacer (9mm) instead. Either way, I highly recommend the new ribbon laces for their versatility, adjustability, stability and comfort. They’re just a total win.



Review: InvisibleShoes Contact 6mm Huaraches

Let me just start off by saying that I’m not much of a huarache person, or maybe not yet, who knows. But my relationship with huaraches, and Invisible Shoes specifically, started at the NYC Barefoot Run back in September. Most of the folks I was hanging out with were wearing some version of a running sandal half the weekend, and except for one time at the Hotel Del in Coronado, CA, the previous December (and I wish I’d stopped to see if he was someone I actually know), I’d never even seen a pair of huaraches on someone before. But during the trip I had a conversation with Steve Sashen of Invisible Shoes, and somehow he managed to convince me that I needed a pair of huaraches. Good salesmanship, I suppose. And a good discount code, too.

So in early October I purchased the 6mm Contact do-it-yourself kit, because I figured that since I’m an art person I must therefore be good at constructing my own running sandals. I guess I must have blocked out all the botched towel holders and teetering curtain hangings I’ve committed in the past, due to my utter lack of construction skill and patience. Alas, what came in the mail was two flat pieces of rubber, two long black tie strings and a link to some videos on how to put everything together. It looked so fun that I immediately ran upstairs to the computer room and got started.

The Construction

I would say that in the progress of my life there have been very few occasions when I have felt truly stupid, and this was one of them. Now, before you start to think that maybe making Invisible shoes huaraches is difficult, let me alleviate your mind by saying it’s actually not. It’s very easy if you possess patience and the correct tools. The soles come with two holes punched into them, one hole that you need to make yourself (between your first and second toes) and a lace that is a little wider than the pre-made holes. Therefore you need to employ a hollow bit (which I don’t have) or a leather punch/awl (which I also don’t have). And if you don’t have any of these items, you should go buy or borrow one from your neighbor (which I didn’t do). Don’t use scissors and an Exacto knife (which I did do).

At this point I’m sure I probably have 20 skilled huarache-lovers rolling their huarache-wearing eyes at me, but what’s done is done. I played the video of Steve and his lovely 70’s-inspired curly locks about 18 times, memorizing each step and doing my best to recreate it with my shoddy tools. I found that the sole didn’t need to be trimmed at all to be an exact fit to my super wide feet (this being the only sign in my genetic code that I’m 1/8 Native American – thanks, Dad’s pasty-white skin), which was good since I probably would have screwed that up anyway. But I had the worst time trying to get the lace through the pre-made holes on the sides – it probably would have been easier with the thinner 4mm Connect kit – but once I got them through, the lacing part was fun. I chose the “slip on” tie method because it looked the most comfortable, and it took me several rounds of watching the “tying” video before I got the tightness right.

The whole process took me 70 minutes, two Exacto blades, half the fuel in a cigarette lighter and 30 F-bombs, but when I was done they looked as awesome as the ones on the feet of all the sandal-wearing hotties at the NYC Barefoot Run. Mostly because the laces hid all the little knife slips that marred the surface of the soles.

By the way, if you suspect you are as much of an idiot as me, I might suggest getting a pair of Custom Made invisible shoes.

The Cool Factor

Like I said above, I’m not much of a huarache runner. I’m not much of a barefoot runner, either. I love the idea of running totally barefoot, and I feel like a badass when I am doing it. I can even be caught taking off my shoes on a mild day, on an interesting ground surface, or when I feel I really need to examine something in my running form, but it’s not my default. I think it might be the same story with huaraches. With that said, running sandals, especially the Invisible Shoes brand, have a huge cool factor in the barefoot/minimalist running world, and in my mind, which made them attractive to me. They are also the lightest and most reasonably-priced viable “shoe” on the market, and everybody who is worth their salt is running ultras in them. So that cool factor definitely draws me to the look and performance of Invisible Shoes.

Also, if you were inspired like me to become a minimalist runner because of the ultimate kings and queens of cool – the Tarahumara tribe of runners in northwestern Mexico – you should probably at least try out a pair of huaraches. And the Invisible Shoes look and feel a lot like the ones the Tarahumara wear, so they seem authentic and may even fool you, like they did me, into thinking you’re an awesome runner. I mean, I will admit that when I started my first run in mine I felt like a god-damn rock star.

The Run

By the time I’d purchased, received and constructed my very own pair of Invisible Shoes, it was already too cold for me to run in them. Late October dumped an unheard-of foot and a half of snow on New England, trashing electrical wires and emptying supermarkets all across the area. Then Thanksgiving came and it was 60 degrees outside. Rather than scratching my head at the insane weather pattern, I slipped on my Invisible Shoes for a nice three mile lunch-break run around a local pond.

Keep in mind, not only was this my first run in a pair of Invisible shoes, it was my first run ever in sandals. So this review is more about my experience wearing running sandals than it is a comparison between brands.

Like I mentioned above I don’t really run barefoot a lot, which means I don’t have very tough soles. I think this might have been a down-side for me with these shoes, because the 6mm sole, while not really any thinner than those on my trusty Bikilas, let me feel…..EVERYTHING. Don’t get me wrong, ground-feel like this is a great thing, but man did these shoes teach me a few things about what I lack as a “barefoot” runner. A good section of the path around the pond is an unpaved rock trail. I think I stepped on about a dozen really sharp rocks and every one of them made me want to swear loudly (but I couldn’t because there were too many old couples sitting on benches within earshot). I can’t put my finger on what the sandals lack that my Bikilas have, but I don’t think I’ll take these out again on such rocky terrain. Luckily the path also had sections of paved road, concrete, grass and hard-packed sand (it’s quite the cornucopia of surfaces, now that I think about it), and the sandals handled those just fine for me.

Big surprising plus to the fit of these shoes: I absolutely expected the nylon laces to bite into my feet and ankles while running. In fact I panicked a little when I realized I forgot the BodyGlide I’d meant to slather all over my feet. I mean, the laces don’t appear to be designed for comfort or stretchiness like some other brands. But to my relief the laces didn’t cause one single blister or sore spot on any part of my foot. The soles of the sandals also didn’t get caught on cracks in the road or cause me to stub my toe on tree roots, which I also feared. For the most part they acted exactly like a very light, very minimalist shoe (as advertised).

I only had one issue during my run, and it was all in my left foot. Again, the shoes reminded me that I still have imperfect form. Over the first quarter mile I kept getting a sharp pain on my second toe because of the lump of knotted lace end on the bottom of the sole. After cursing the whole idea of huaraches for about three minutes, I realized I was scrunching the toes in my left foot and pushing off. Oops. That was an easy fix and it was fine afterward, but I noticed my feet were flopping into the front of the shoe a bit, and my normally silent footfalls were making a “flop-THWAP, flop-THWAP” sound. I stopped to adjust the laces but they were pretty tight on my feet already and I didn’t want to over-tighten them. So I kept going, hoping that my feet would swell up a bit after awhile and fill out the extra space.

By the time I finished my three miles I had a hot spot near my big toe on the ball of my left foot. It’s the only place I’ve ever sustained reoccurring blisters since I started barefoot running, so I know it’s a lacking in my form (my left foot always stays on the ground too long). But it’s a lacking I have worked on for so long without success that I’ve come to think it’s more to do with some musculoskeletal imbalance that I have yet to identify. The Invisible Shoes highlight this imperfection. So I would say the big plus of these sandals is that, like barefoot, they don’t let you get away with shitty form of any kind. Because of that, this would be an excellent training shoe for a beginner minimalist runner who doesn’t want to go completely barefoot. For this purpose they would be much better than, say, a pair of Vibrams.

The Public Reaction

I want to include a commentary on the public reaction I got from running in my Invisible Shoes. A couple of years ago, the Vibram FiveFinger was the favorite “weird, creepy running shoe” of the barefoot running illiterate. But nowadays I no longer even get a second glance if I wear my Classics out to the mall. But if you ever decide you want to renew your bounty of weird looks in 2011, go for a run around the ‘burbs of Boston in a pair of Invisible Shoes. It’s funny, too, because I don’t think people would think much of me walking in these sandals, they don’t look much different from what’s in style these days.

The lake near my work.

Anyway, it was a beautiful 65 degree afternoon when I ran in these, so there were a ton of old and young couples walking together, moms pushing strollers, dog walkers, executives talking business while exercising on their lunch breaks, speed walkers in matching sweat suits, and a couple of shod runners (with horrible form, I might add). I got a weird look from each and every person I ran by. One middle-aged lady actually pulled her Portuguese Water Dog closer to her for protection when she saw me coming. Halfway through my run two power walkers whom I had lapped twice stopped me to yell out “Where are your sneakers (pronounced ‘sneak-as’)?” I just shrugged my shoulders and answered, “Oh, I lost them.” They returned to their walk, completely perplexed, and I turned away quickly so they wouldn’t see my grin.

Final Thoughts

Although I do think I like my Invisible Shoes, I still have mixed feelings about huaraches overall. With that said, this review comes after only one test run, and at a time in the year that doesn’t afford me the chance to do a whole lot of running in sandals.

My dirty feet after the run.

The pros for me are the extremely light sole and comfortable laces that offer versatile tying methods. I also appreciate their very authentic Tarahumara huarache feel, which I find many other running sandal brands lack.

What I need to get used to is their inability to cover up any flaws in form (which is actually a plus, but I’m being whiny about it), and I need to perfect the tightness of the lacing to prevent the flop-THWAP problem. Apparently, the sweet spot is somewhere between comfortable and too tight.

So even though I had a lot to say about my first run in these shoes, I plan to revisit them again when the weather warms up this spring.

How do you like your Invisible Shoes? I’d love to hear.